Capella 163, Cetus Revisited

capella163-bw

And Daniel he heralded the boat
and directed her well
across the wind and waves
– waterboys

A couple days ago I took Mary down to Rutabaga in Madison to test paddle the P&H Cetus. Mary owns a Romany but does not paddle often so it feels a bit wild when conditions get rough. I had a feeling the Cetus while longer than the Romany, might fit her needs better. It was certainly worth a go. Meanwhile since I was there anyway it seemed like a good time to try out the P&H Capella 163…

The Capella 163 is a sharp, classic British designed sea kayak which stands on a line with the Romany, the Avocet or the slightly longer Alaw Bach. It’s the kayak you want to surf, bum around in rock gardens, teach or generally mess about in boats, the classic “all around” kayak. So I was jazzed to give it a go. The thing was, once I actually sat in it I was in for a bit of a surprise. I didn’t fit. Well, I shouldn’t say I didn’t fit. I should say in the “review” vernacular that the design of the cockpit caused my lower body to have less than desirable connection to the hull… but more on that later.

Atlantic Kayak Tours offers the exact quick overview I would have given the Capella. It’s certainly stable. It fits nicely in between wobbly [when empty] Bahiya and the rock solid Cetus. Much of that comes from the obvious sense of how high you are off the water depending on hull shape. In the Bahiya you feel as if you are sitting on a ball high above the waves. The Capella brings you down to a more comfortable relationship with the waterline, and the Cetus sets you right in the water.

On the day I took it out we had pretty crazy winds which was pretty much the same conditions I had the day before when I took my Rockpool out, and again the same conditions as a few days prior when I test paddled the Cetus. So I’m getting used to the feel of kayaks in crazy winds recently. In the Capella 163 I never found need of the skeg. It seemed happy to live in its own little world with little notice of the harsh winds for the most part. Once when I was turning off the wind I did notice  that I had to really convince the kayak to turn. My sense is that it would react more to wave but as it was, we had lots of wind but no waves to speak of.

In protected waters, the Capella turned quickly and sat solidly on edge. It acted just as I would expect it to without any noticeable unique personality quirks. The Capella is as advertised, “a nimble, go everywhere, do everything” sort of kayak and should be on everyone’s list of kayaks to test paddle when shopping for a new boat.

Now when I mention the Capella in relationship to other kayaks in it’s class you might wonder why you would choose this one over one of the others. Good question. Each kayak has it’s own little ways as it were. Something that sings to one person or another. If you like the Romany, Avocet, Alaw, Capella class of kayaks one will probably speak to you more than the others. However, I can say, least for the moment the P&H boats are impressive in their quality and quality control. They are well made boats which is not as common as you may think.

Now, the reason I feel I couldn’t give a totally fair accounting of the Capella 163 as I said was that it simply didn’t fit my body. The thigh braces were too far forward and the deck was high enough that I had to get up on my toes to get any sort of connection to the hull. This meant of course that I could try things in big brush ways, but I couldn’t control it more subtly. I could roll it for instance, but I didn’t feel connected enough to try more finicky rolls. I’m told that the combing in the Capella 163 is slightly different and that the Capella 167 may fit better. I’ll have to try that out sometime. While the 163 is a great boat, I’d have to do some creative mini-cell work to get really comfortable.

Oh, and how did Mary feel about the Cetus? Like me, she loved it.. but for totally different reasons. And that’s what really excites me about that kayak. An experienced paddler can do a lot with it, while at the same time someone of less experience can jump in and feel confident enough to stretch themselves.  That added confidence in an agile boat means a lot.  It means less self-assured or less experienced paddlers can relax and enjoy a day on the water even if there is a bit of wind and wave out there. That’s a rare quality and why I’m feeling pretty much sold on the Cetus at this point. Unless something that’s a shockingly better fit [for me] comes along…soon.

 

8 Responses to Capella 163, Cetus Revisited

  • Marius says:

    Interesting review. What is your height/weight?

    • derrick says:

      I’m 5’8″ 220 but most would say I don’t look nearly that heavy.. I fit well in a romany, anas acuta, cetus, or bach without any fuss..

  • Marius says:

    Thanks, that allows me to compare notes on Cap 163.
    At 5.9 I found the cockpit roomy but providing good “on demand” contact.
    Incidentally, Josh, you’ll probably meet him this weekend, paddles Cap 163 and can hand roll it six ways from Sunday, but he is a bit taller.

    My biggest complaint about Cap 163 is the seat. It might be anatomically correct for someone, but not for me.

  • Mike Devlin says:

    I like agree with your thoughts on the P&H boats, I have paddled the Quest LV for the past 4 years, a really great boat. I am now waiting for the boys at P&H to get my Cetus LV ready :-)

    The LV is a different beast than the Cetus, more playfull & a lot lower volume…

    I have paddled all of the P&H boats, and believe that they are really producing boats that will last a lifetime physically & design wise

    all the best
    MikeD

  • Dominique Sellier says:

    Whatever boat you buy, it would be interesting if you were to write feedbacks at let say 3, 6 and 12 months… to see how the boat ages, and how your impressions / assessment evolve.

    As for kayak “fit”, a very seasoned pro paddler told me once: just look at the morphology and paddling styles of the designers / firm owners, and you will have a good idea of who the kayaks are for and their paddling characteristics. I always felt there was some truth in it for well known / famed kayaks that have “character”. Then there are the many bland ones – specified by marketers. Does that make any sense to you given you recent experiences?

    Happy decision making…

  • Roy says:

    Hey Derick

    Yu might want to try the Cap 161…I like it better than the 163

    might just fit You better

    Best Wishes
    Roy

  • DC says:

    Derrick,

    Have you spent any time with the Impex Cat 4? What was your impression?

    • derrick says:

      It’s on my list. A friend has one that he really loves. He chose it over an NDK Explorer which was his other choice.



Categories